Start with the decision
Use prequalification to decide what evidence you need from a site utility business for this particular project. Prioritize experience with the specified systems, connection coordination and constrained site access. A completed form is only a record of responses; it does not independently verify capability or replace project-specific checks.
This guide is for business-to-business project planning in the United States and Canada. For the wider trade context, visit the site utilities resource hub.
Connect the evidence to the package
| Work package | Relevant example to discuss | Clarification |
|---|---|---|
| Service runs | A comparable assignment involving system plans and defined start and end points | Which existing-service and ground records are available? |
| Connections and structures | A comparable assignment involving connection details and structure schedule | Who authorizes and coordinates each connection? |
| Reinstatement | A comparable assignment involving surface boundaries and handoff requirements | Who accepts the area before the next surface trade starts? |
Download the site utilities prequalification worksheet (CSV)
Fill in the response, owner or source, and date checked. Keep unresolved items visible. The file contains planning prompts only; it does not calculate quantities or make an approval decision.
Put the checklist to work
- State the package, location and intended schedule before asking the business for information. Request only evidence relevant to this engagement.
- Ask for its actual role in a comparable project. Separate work delivered directly from work performed by another business.
- Identify applicable qualification checks with the responsible project team and verify relevant credentials through the appropriate issuing source. Do not assume one check covers every jurisdiction.
- Review capacity against approved information, service-owner coordination and readiness of preceding ground work. A record of past work does not establish present availability. Keep confidential qualification material in an agreed secure channel.
A scope gap worth discussing
Illustrative example — not a Build Accord client project
A site-service proposal stops at the property boundary while another includes coordination to the connection point. Confirm the actual scope and authorized responsibilities before comparing bids.
Apply this to your decision: An evidence register showing what was requested, what was received, who checked it and what remains open before selection.
Using this in the US and Canada
For a project in the United States
Record the state, local jurisdiction and actual service area. Confirm the project location and the scope of the business’s authority with the responsible project team. The U.S. Small Business Administration provides a starting point for business licensing resources.
For a project in Canada
Record the province or territory, municipality and actual service area. Use Canada’s permits and licences resources to locate relevant checks, including the linked BizPaL service. Confirm requirements for the actual activity and location.
For either market, state the currency, units and deadline time zone. This worksheet is general planning guidance, not a determination of licensing, procurement eligibility or technical compliance.
The next useful step
Continue with site utilities pre-bid site visit checklist. For the other side of the conversation, see the site utilities bid proposal guide.
Build Accord coordinates introductions between construction project teams and trade contractors. An inquiry starts a discussion of fit and availability; it does not guarantee a contractor, an invitation to bid or an award. These guides are not a listing of currently available crews or projects.